Saving the World

This is how arguments should be made. People that know what they are talking about expressing their opinions in a logical and precise way. Moore just so happens to be a co-founder of Greenpeace and he supports nuclear power. If that doesn't give him credibility I dont know what will. He brings up each and every alternative viewpoint or contradicting statement and manages to shoot them all down with ease. He explains how other methods are unreliable, other targets are more vulnerable to attack, and other materials are just as dangerous. This man knows what he is talking about and gives a great argument. Kitman didnt really do it for me. Maybe because he cant really stand in comparison to talking about power sources to what kind of car to drive. Dont get me wrong, being environmentally friendly is great and all, but finding a new power source to fuel the world seems to be a little more important. And while Kitman may be quite knowledgable about cars, his title isnt nearly as impressive. Either way, he has a great argument about hybrid cars not being exactly what they claim to be, which is just another example of people getting caught up in a good idea. But thats the beauty of capitalism right? being able to be sold anything. Anyway, this Kitman guy points out a bunch of flaws, but doesnt exactly point out how to resolve this issue with an alternative method. But I guess he is doing his part just by informing the public. Overall, these two really new what they were talking about and were quite convincing in the argument of it.